On the surface, this statement suggests that love is not merely a transient emotional experience, like joy or sadness, but rather a fundamental aspect of who you are. It implies that love is not something you *do* or *feel* occasionally, but something you *are* constantly, even if you are unaware of it.

Krishnamurti, operating within a modern non-dual framework that often echoes Vedantic ideas, points to the underlying unity that precedes all phenomena. In this view, the 'self' as a separate entity is an illusion. What remains when the ego's projections and identifications dissolve is pure awareness, a state of being that is inherently loving. This is not a cultivated love, but the unconditioned ground of existence itself, akin to Brahman in Advaita Vedanta. The 'feeling' of love arises when this natural state is recognized and allowed to express itself through the individual form, but the state itself is prior to and independent of the feeling. It is the stillness from which all movement arises, the silence in which all sound is heard.

In your life: Notice when you identify love with a specific feeling or person. Can you sense the underlying stillness or presence that remains even when those feelings or associations fade?